Search results for "Number needed to screen"

showing 2 items of 2 documents

Estimated stroke risk, yield, and number needed to screen for atrial fibrillation detected through single time screening: a multicountry patient-leve…

2019

Background The precise age distribution and calculated stroke risk of screen-detected atrial fibrillation (AF) is not known. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the number needed to screen (NNS) to identify one treatable new AF case (NNS-Rx) (i.e., Class-1 oral anticoagulation [OAC] treatment recommendation) in each age stratum. If the NNS-Rx is known for each age stratum, precise cost-effectiveness and sensitivity simulations can be performed based on the age distribution of the population/region to be screened. Such calculations are required by national authorities and organisations responsible for health system budgets to determine the best age cutoffs for screening programs and d…

MaleHealth ScreeningEconomicsSocial Sciences030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyVascular MedicineScreening programmeElectrocardiography0302 clinical medicineRisk FactorsHealth careAtrial FibrillationMedicine and Health SciencesMass ScreeningPublic and Occupational Health030212 general & internal medicinemedia_commonAged 80 and overRAge FactorsGeneral MedicineMiddle AgedUniversity hospitalPrognosis3. Good healthStrokeBioassays and Physiological AnalysisNeurologyHealthMedicineFemaleTraining programArrhythmiaResearch ArticleAdultCerebrovascular DiseasesCost-Effectiveness AnalysisCardiologyLibrary scienceResearch and Analysis MethodsRisk AssessmentStroke risk03 medical and health sciencesYoung AdultAge DistributionSex FactorsPopulation MetricsPredictive Value of TestsPolitical sciencemedia_common.cataloged_instanceHumansEarly careerEuropean unionIschemic StrokeAgedHealth Care PolicyPopulation Biologybusiness.industryElectrophysiological TechniquesBiology and Life SciencesNumber needed to screenEconomic AnalysisHealth CareAge GroupsPeople and PlaceseHealthPopulation GroupingsCardiac ElectrophysiologybusinessScreening Guidelines
researchProduct

Comparison of the yield from two faecal immunochemical tests at identical cutoff concentrations – a randomized trial in Latvia

2016

OBJECTIVE We have compared the performance of two faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) in an average-risk population. MATERIALS AND METHODS Altogether, 10 000 individuals aged 50-74 were selected randomly from the population of Latvia in 2011 and assigned randomly either to OC-Sensor or to FOB Gold single-time testing. Positivity of the test, frequency of colonic lesions, number needed to screen (NNscreen) and scope for the detection of an advanced neoplasm (cancer and advanced adenoma) were compared between the tests using the same cutoff concentrations in µg/g faeces. Confidence intervals (CIs) at 95% were calculated. RESULTS Positivity with the cutoff set at 10 µg/g faeces was 12.8% (95% CI…

AdenomaMalemedicine.medical_specialtyPopulationColonoscopyGastroenterologylaw.invention03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRandomized controlled trialPredictive Value of TestslawInternal medicineHumansMass ScreeningMedicineCutoffeducationFecesAgededucation.field_of_studyHepatologymedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryGastroenterologyReproducibility of ResultsColonoscopyMiddle AgedImmunohistochemistryLatviaNumber needed to screenConfidence intervalOccult Blood030220 oncology & carcinogenesisPredictive value of testsFemale030211 gastroenterology & hepatologyColorectal NeoplasmsbusinessEuropean Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
researchProduct